Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

The Well-Architected Architect

Modernizing Cloud Excellence

Chris Ayers

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Chris Ayers

Senior Software Engineer
Azure CXP AzRel
Microsoft

BlueSky: @chris-ayers.com
LinkedIn: - chris-l-ayers
Blog: https://chris-ayers.com/
GitHub: Codebytes
Mastodon: @Chrisayers@hachyderm.io
Twitter: @Chris_L_Ayers

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Agenda

  • Solution Architecture Fundamentals
  • Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework
  • Framework Overview & Assessment Cadence
  • Pillar Deep Dive
  • Trade-Offs
  • WAF Service Guides & Impact
  • Well-Architected Workloads
  • Q&A
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Solution Architecture Fundamentals

7 Principles for Cloud Excellence

🎯 Strategic

  1. Decision Framework
  2. Design Patterns
  3. Future Thinking

"Architecture is a team sport played with strategic thinking"

🛠️ Operational

  1. Supportability
  2. Continuous Learning

🤝 Collaborative

  1. Team Success
  2. Methodical Approach
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Architecture Fundamentals - Core Role Focus

Architecture = Intentional decision system.

You Own:

  • Map requirements → patterns & platform
  • Bake in ops (observability, support, DR) early
  • Surface & record trade-offs fast
  • Keep design iterative & reversible first

Superpower: Multi-perspective experience (build → run → secure → recover).

Ongoing decisions, not a static diagram.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Architecture Fundamentals - Decision Framework

5 Steps (loop): Identify → Analyze → Decide → Implement → Learn.

Keys

  • Track decisions in backlog early
  • Classify reversible vs one-way doors
  • Capture rationale & alternatives (ADR)
  • Link ADR → work items
  • Update after incidents / KPIs

Bias to reversible choices under uncertainty.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Architecture Fundamentals - Pattern & Forward Thinking

Patterns

  • Use proven patterns (circuit breaker, cache-aside, bulkhead, valet key)
  • Prefer simplicity over bespoke cleverness

Forward Scan

  • Scale & data growth thresholds
  • Compliance / residency horizon
  • Deprecations & preview risk
  • Evolution seams pre-planned

Instrument to see approaching cliffs early.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Architecture Fundamentals - Supportability & Collaboration

Supportability

  • Standard telemetry schema
  • Golden signals + synthetics
  • Correlation IDs & clear errors

Collaboration

  • Cross-discipline reviews
  • External architecture consults
  • Pattern & ADR library upkeep

Growth Loop: Learn → apply → codify.

If not operable, it’s not done.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Architecture Fundamentals - Method & Improvement

Toolkit

  • Checklists & maturity baseline
  • ADR catalog + pattern library
  • Fitness reports (drift & KPI deltas)

Loop

Assess → Prioritize → Implement → Validate → Instrument → Reassess

Outcome: Intentional, current architecture.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

1. Decision-Making Framework

Architecture Decision Records

# ADR-001: Multi-Region Strategy
Status: Accepted
Date: 2025-01-15

## Context
Need 99.99% availability for 
critical healthcare platform

## Decision
Implement active-active across
3 Azure regions

## Consequences
- 3x infrastructure cost
- Complex data sync

Key Elements

✅ Early Identification
Document decisions before they're made

✅ Risk Assessment
One-way doors vs. two-way doors

✅ Clear Rationale
Why this choice over alternatives

✅ Learning Loop
Post-implementation reviews

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

2. Master Cloud Design Patterns

Reliability Patterns

  • 🔄 Circuit Breaker
  • 🎯 Bulkhead Isolation
  • ♻️ Retry with Backoff

Performance Patterns

  • 📦 Cache-Aside
  • 🚀 CQRS
  • 📊 Event Sourcing

Security Patterns

  • 🔐 Valet Key
  • 🛡️ Gatekeeper
  • 🎭 Federated Identity

Modern Patterns

  • 📡 Event-Driven
  • 🔗 Service Mesh
  • 🌐 Edge Computing

💡 Pro Tip: Start with Azure Architecture Center pattern catalog

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

3. Forward-Thinking Design

🔮 Anticipate Change

  • Workload growth: 10x planning
  • Regional expansion readiness
  • Compliance evolution tracking

🚀 Embrace Innovation

  • Preview features evaluation matrix
  • Gradual rollout strategies
  • Fallback mechanisms

🛡️ Avoid Design Cliffs

  • No single points of failure
  • Vendor lock-in mitigation
  • Technology abstraction layers

Real Example: Netflix's migration from monolith → microservices → serverless

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

4. Design for Supportability

📊 Observable by Default

Every service includes

  • Structured logging
  • Distributed tracing
  • Custom metrics
  • Health endpoints
  • SLI/SLO dashboards

🔧 Support-Friendly

  • Self-healing mechanisms
  • Graceful degradation
  • Clear error messages
  • Runbook automation
  • ChatOps integration

Success Metric: Time to resolve incidents ↓ 75% with proper observability

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

5. Continuous Skill Enhancement

📚 Learning Paths

  • Certifications: AZ-305, AI-102
  • Specializations: FinOps, MLOps
  • Emerging: Quantum, Edge AI

🏗️ Hands-On Practice

  • Weekly architecture katas
  • Open source contributions
  • Hackathon participation

🤖 AI-Augmented Skills

  • Copilot for architecture
  • AI-assisted code reviews
  • Automated documentation
  • Pattern recognition tools

🌐 Community

  • Local meetups
  • Architecture forums
  • Conference speaking
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

6. Collaboration Excellence

🤝 Key Partnerships

Internal Teams

  • Product owners
  • Security champions
  • Site reliability engineers
  • Data scientists

External Experts

  • Cloud solution architects
  • Partner technical specialists
  • Community MVPs
  • Industry consultants
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

7. Methodical Design Approach

Structure Brings Success

🛠️ Essential Tools

  • Design: Visio, Draw.io, Lucidchart, C4 Model
  • Documentation: ADRs, Wiki, Backstage
  • Assessment: WAF Review, Azure Advisor
  • Validation: Chaos Engineering, Load Testing

"A good architecture is not accidental-it's methodical"

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework Goals

The Azure Well-Architected Framework drives real world business outcomes by guiding organizations to:

  • Enhance Resilience: Higher availability and faster recovery
  • Improve Security: Proactive protection of critical data
  • Optimize Costs: Streamlined resource usage
  • Accelerate Innovation: Faster feature deployment
  • Boost Operational Excellence: Robust monitoring and automation
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Business Impact: Real Numbers

Proven ROI & Outcomes

  • 304% ROI within 3 years (Forrester Study)
  • 40% reduction in downtime (Global Retailer)
  • 25% cost savings (Financial Services)
  • 75% faster server updates (Manufacturing)
  • 93/100 security score (Profisee)
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Framework Benefits

  • Resilient, available, and recoverable workloads
  • Strong security and risk management
  • Optimized costs with high ROI
  • Support for agile development and operations
  • Consistent performance and scalability
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Azure Well-Architected Framework Overview

Pillar Core Goal
Reliability Stay available & recover fast
Security Protect identities, data & workloads
Cost Optimization Maximize business value per dollar
Operational Excellence Efficient operations & rapid improvement
Performance Efficiency Right-size & scale on demand

Treat the framework as an ongoing fitness regimen-not a one-time audit.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Reliability Pillar

"Will it stay up & recover?"

Focus on sustained availability, graceful degradation, and validated recovery.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Reliability - Principles

Reliability = keep user promise under failure.

  • Explicit SLI/RTO/RPO & UX expectations
  • Design for graceful degradation (resilience)
  • Fast detect + recover (observability + runbooks)
  • Minimize complexity in critical paths

Maxim: Resilience is engineered, not discovered after the fact.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Reliability - Practices

  • Multi-region for Tier 0 + health probes
  • Quarterly chaos experiments
  • Synthetic user journeys + health model
  • Tiered backups + timed restore drills
  • Automated failover validation

Emerging:

  • Advisor Score driven next action
  • Shift to automated chaos
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Reliability - Key Metrics

Metric Target Lever
Request Success Rate ≥ 99.9% (align to SLO) Progressive delivery + health probes + fast rollback
Error Budget Burn < 20% cycle SLO review + hardening
MTTR ↓ trend Auto diagnostics + rollback
Restore Drill Success ≥ 99% Timed restore exercises

Levers: failover tests, chaos, simplification.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Reliability - Architecture Example

Resilient architecture illustration showing redundant regional deployment

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Reliability - Maturity Progression

Level Current Next Shift Accelerator
1 Ad Hoc Manual restarts; unknown backup validity Define & test RTO/RPO Scope + first timed restore
2 Baseline Documented failover path Probes + scheduled restore drills Drill cadence
3 Structured Runbooks + starter chaos SLO + error budget govern releases Chaos on critical flows
4 Proactive Auto failover + health model Timed restore KPIs + broaden chaos CI failover test
5 Adaptive Continuous resilience engineering Predictive scale + self-heal loops Predictive scaling + self-heal scripts

Sequence: remove unknowns → speed detection → widen safe automation.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Reliability - At a Glance

Core Azure Focus
🧭 Multi-region & AZ design
🛡️ Data protection (backup + geo-replication)
🩺 Health modeling & synthetic probes

Fast Diagnostic
Last chaos / failover drill outcome (✅ / ❌)

Focus first on removing unknowns in recovery path before adding more redundancy.

Typical Early Gap
🚩 Runbooks never fully executed end-to-end

Signals to Track

  • Error budget burn %
  • RTO / RPO adherence
  • Successful timed restore drills

Quick Win
Run a 30-min tabletop + one automated failover script this week.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Security Pillar

"Can it be breached or abused?"

Emphasizes least privilege, segmentation, and continuous threat detection.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Security - Principles

  • Threat model + shared responsibility upfront
  • Least privilege + segmentation + encryption
  • Continuous assessment & patch / vuln flow
  • Zero Trust verification on every request

Maxim: Security is an engineering practice, not a gate.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Security - Practices & Patterns

  • Enforce Zero Trust (MFA, CA, JIT)
  • Secrets in Key Vault only
  • Network segmentation + WAF
  • Defender for Cloud remediation SLAs
  • Central security logging

Emerging:

  • AI workload safeguards (watermarking)
  • Automated threat triage (Copilot)
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Security - Key Metrics

Metric Target Lever
Secure Score > 80% Prioritized remediation
MFA Coverage 100% Conditional Access policies
Vuln MTTR < 14 days Patch automation

Levers: least privilege, segmentation, scanning.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Security - Architecture Example

  1. Front Door + WAF + DDoS
  2. App Gateway / mTLS ingress
  3. Segmented app tier (private endpoints)
  4. Key Vault + encrypted data stores
  5. Central SIEM + automated triage

Blueprint Goal: Rapid containment & traceability.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Security Maturity (Progression + Accelerators)

Level Focus (Condensed) Key Shift Accelerator
1 Core Hygiene (MFA, patch, secrets) Enforce MFA & baseline hardening MFA + secret externalization
2 Expanded Segmentation & posture Secure Score backlog Segmentation + Secure Score
3 Threat-Informed Threat modeling + IR Central logging & triage Threat modeling + IR runbooks
4 Adaptive Automated response & risk-based access SOAR workflow automation SOAR + risk-based policies
5 Advanced Continuous simulation & ML detection Zero Trust + least privilege by design Continuous simulation (red/purple)

Trajectory: static controls → signal-driven prevention & rapid containment.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Security - At a Glance

Core Azure Focus
🆔 Strong identity (MFA / PIM)
🔐 Secrets in Key Vault only
🧱 Segmentation + threat detection (Defender / Sentinel)

Fast Diagnostic
Secure Score trend + count of open critical vulns

Treat identity as the primary security boundary; reduce standing privilege relentlessly.

Typical Early Gap
🚩 Privileged identity hygiene (stale Global Admins)

Signals to Track

  • MFA coverage %
  • Key Vault secret rot cadence
  • Vulnerability MTTR

Quick Win
Expire unused privileged roles & enable PIM + just-in-time elevation.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cost Optimization Pillar

"Are we creating value per dollar?"

Drives financial accountability, efficiency, and spend-to-value alignment.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cost Optimization - Principles

  • Budget guardrails + ownership tagging
  • Engineer elasticity & eliminate waste
  • Tie spend to business KPIs & unit cost
  • Document cost vs reliability/perf trade-offs

Maxim: Unmeasured cost is uncontrolled cost.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cost Optimization - Practices & Governance

  • Enforced tagging & budgets
  • Autoscale + off-hour shutdown
  • Rightsize & commitment coverage
  • Spot / tiered storage
  • Anomaly detection & review

Emerging:

  • Sustainability KPIs (energy proxy)
  • Caching to reduce expensive ops
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cost Optimization - Key Metrics

Metric Target Lever
Idle Spend < 5% Decommission & schedules
Commitment Coverage > 70% Rightsize + purchase planning
Unit Cost ↓ QoQ Performance + elasticity

Levers: tagging, scaling, lifecycle policies.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cost Optimization - Architecture Example

  1. Enforced tagging & budgets
  2. Autoscale + spot for batch
  3. Storage tiering lifecycle
  4. Cache hot read reduction
  5. Cost dashboard & anomaly alerts

Blueprint Goal: Predictable unit economics.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cost Optimization Maturity Progression

Level Focus (Condensed) Key Shift Accelerator
1 Ownership Tags + visibility Assign DRI & shared transparency Tag policy + cost DRI
2 Visibility Cost model + alerts Formalize reports & baseline drivers Cost model + budget alerts
3 Signals Usage & flow analysis Guardrails + anomaly triage cadence Anomaly triage cadence
4 Prod Insights Rightsizing & demand shaping Autoscale tuning + lifecycle policies Demand shaping + rightsizing loops
5 Optimize @ Scale Predictive + unit economics Forecast accuracy + DR cost optimization Forecast accuracy + DR cost review

Trajectory: visibility → signals → automation at scale. .

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cost Optimization - At a Glance

Core Azure Focus
🏷️ Enforced tagging & ownership
📉 Elasticity & rightsizing loops
🗃️ Storage lifecycle + commitment mgmt

Fast Diagnostic
Idle spend % + tag coverage heatmap

Cost fitness = visibility → accountability → automation. Optimize after measuring.

Typical Early Gap
🚩 No policy-backed tagging = opaque spend

Signals to Track

  • Idle / unattached resources
  • Savings Plan / RI coverage %
  • Unit cost (e.g., $ / txn) trend

Quick Win
Implement a tag policy (env, owner, costCenter) + weekly idle resource report.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Operational Excellence Pillar

"Can we change & learn fast?"

Centers on disciplined delivery, observability, and continual improvement.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Operational Excellence - Principles

  • Shared ownership (build → run)
  • Instrument first; scale second
  • Progressive, reversible deploys
  • Automate high-frequency toil

Maxim: Operate to learn; learn to operate better.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Operational Excellence - Practices & Automation

  • Gated CI/CD + policy
  • Progressive delivery rings
  • Standard SLO dashboards
  • Automate frequent runbooks
  • Blameless retros → ADR updates

Emerging:

  • Maturity scoring focus
  • AI-assisted event reduction
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Operational Excellence - Key Metrics

Metric Target Lever
Deploy Frequency Daily+ Small batches + automation
Change Failure Rate < 15% Progressive rollout + tests
MTTR < 1h Sev2 Runbooks + observability

Levers: telemetry unification, rollback automation.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Operational Excellence - Architecture Example

  1. Gated PR → secure build
  2. Canary + progressive rings
  3. Unified telemetry spine
  4. Automated remediation rules
  5. Post-incident ADR updates

Blueprint Goal: High velocity, low MTTR.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Operational Excellence - Maturity Progression

Level Focus (Condensed) Key Shift Accelerator
1 Foundation DevOps culture + basic CI Shared vocab & source control norms Shared on-call + IaC adoption
2 Standardize Roles, IaC, core processes Off-the-shelf tooling & baseline automation Standardized pipelines + roles
3 Release Ready Env + gated pipelines Health model + incident workflow Health model + incident taxonomy
4 Production Ops SLO dashboards + progressive delivery Runbook automation & retros to ADRs Auto-remediation + retro loop
5 Adaptable Continuous modernization Self-service envs & pervasive automation Self-service env + friction audits

Trajectory: culture → standardization → automation → modernization.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Operational Excellence - At a Glance

Core Azure Focus
🚀 Gated CI/CD + progressive delivery
📊 Unified observability spine
🛠️ Automated runbooks & incident workflow

Fast Diagnostic
DORA metrics snapshot (Deploy Freq, Lead Time, CFR, MTTR)

Velocity safely increases when feedback loops are fast, visible, and trusted.

Typical Early Gap
🚩 Telemetry exists but no actionable SLO dashboards

Signals to Track

  • Change failure rate (%)
  • MTTR trend
  • Auto-remediation success count

Quick Win
Define one SLO + error budget and wire alert to a Slack/Teams channel.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Performance Efficiency Pillar

"Will it meet SLOs under scale?"

Ensures responsive scaling, optimized hot paths, and sustained tail latency control.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Performance Efficiency - Principles

  • Business SLOs (latency / throughput)
  • Just-in-time elastic scaling
  • Partition & cache for hot paths
  • Measure & tune based on profiling

Maxim: Performance is a promise you must continuously verify.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Performance Efficiency - Practices & Patterns

  • Load + capacity tests pre-peak
  • Autoscale on meaningful metrics
  • CDN + Redis hot path caching
  • Partition / shard early
  • Profile tail latency (P95/P99)

Emerging:

  • Adaptive concurrency controls
  • Predictive autoscale policies
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Performance Efficiency - Key Metrics

Metric Target Lever
P95 Latency SLO met Caching + profiling
Cache Hit Ratio > 85% Key design + eviction
Autoscale Reaction < 5 min Threshold tuning

Levers: async patterns, caching, partitioning.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Performance Efficiency - Architecture Example

  1. CDN + Front Door cache
  2. Stateless autoscaling API
  3. Async queue offload
  4. Redis + partitioned data
  5. Predictive scale rules

Blueprint Goal: Linear scale within latency SLO.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Performance Efficiency Maturity Progression

Level Focus (Condensed) Key Shift Accelerator
1 Targets Initial SLOs & component fit Capture perf expectations early SLO draft + rough capacity estimate
2 Baseline Metrics Instrument & capacity plan Critical flow metrics & baselines Perf baselines + hot path mapping
3 Signal Driven Real user + synthetic insights Hot path tuning + data-driven refactors Profiling + targeted caching/sharding
4 Prod Optimization Isolation & advanced data mgmt Perf gates in delivery pipeline Perf gates in CI/CD + isolation
5 Continuous Tuning Experimentation & automation Hypothesis-driven improvements Hypothesis experiments + predictive scale

Trajectory: establish targets → measure → signal-driven → gated optimization.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Performance Efficiency - At a Glance

Core Azure Focus
⚖️ Autoscale on meaningful metrics
🧠 Hot path caching & partitioning
🧪 Profiling + tail latency management

Fast Diagnostic
P95 latency vs SLO delta (gap & trend)

Performance improvements start with a repeatable baseline—instrument before tuning.

Typical Early Gap
🚩 No sustained load / capacity test baseline

Signals to Track

  • P95 / P99 latency trend
  • Cache hit ratio (%)
  • Autoscale reaction time

Quick Win
Run a 1-hour load test; record baseline P95 + identify top 1 slow span.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Trade-Offs

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Cross-Pillar Shared Levers

Lever Primary Pillars Impacted Core Benefit
Global edge + health routing Reliability, Performance Faster failover & lower latency at scale
Strong identity + least privilege Security, Operational Excellence Reduced blast radius & clearer access governance
Observability spine (logs, metrics, traces) All Pillars Unified signals accelerate detection, tuning, and learning
Autoscale + lightweight architecture Performance, Cost, Reliability Elastic capacity without chronic overprovisioning
Policy & automation guardrails Security, Cost, Operational Excellence Consistent compliance & reduced manual toil

One leveraged investment should advance at least two pillars—use this list to frame improvement proposals.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Trade-Offs Overview

Tension Pair Competing Forces Friction Signal Primary Mitigation Lens
Performance vs Security Latency vs inspection depth Rising auth / inspection latency Edge offload + scoped deep inspection
Reliability vs Cost Redundancy vs spend efficiency Escalating standby cost Tiered criticality + right-sized DR
Velocity vs Stability Change frequency vs failure risk Spike in change failure rate Progressive delivery + automated rollback
Cost vs Performance Budget guardrails vs headroom Reactive scaling / throttling Autoscale + load test baselines
Security vs Operability Tight control vs engineer throughput Privilege escalation toil JIT least privilege + workflow automation

Guiding Principle: Surface → Document → Measure → Recalibrate.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Unstated trade-offs become accidental architecture

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Trade-Off Matrix

Optimize For Potential Impact On Example Tension Mitigation Strategy
Extreme Reliability Cost Optimization Active-active multi-region cost ↑ Tiered criticality; pilot light for non-critical
Strict Security Controls Performance Efficiency Added latency from deep inspection Offload with Azure Front Door WAF / caching
Lowest Possible Cost Reliability / Performance Under-provisioned resources Autoscale + performance SLO guardrails
Max Performance Cost Optimization Over-provisioning high SKU Right-size via load test baselines + scheduled reviews
Rapid Deployment Velocity Security / Stability Increased change failure risk Shift-left scans + progressive delivery
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Pillar Interactions & Decision Anchors

Operational Excellence Enables All

  • Enables secure deployments
  • Improves reliability through consistency
  • Provides insights for cost optimization
  • Supports performance monitoring

Decision Anchors

  • Start with explicit business outcomes & candidate SLOs
  • Declare non-negotiable (guardrail) pillars per workload tier
  • Make trade-offs transparent & time-box re-evaluation
  • Record decisions + linked metrics in ADRs

Momentum Pattern: Clear anchors + observable metrics turn pillar tension into a continuous improvement loop.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

🔁 Continuous Improvement & Pillar Maturity

Level Trait Focus
1 Ad Hoc Reactive, inconsistent Baseline inventory & metrics
2 Emerging Initial standards appear Define SLOs & security baselines
3 Defined Repeatable + dashboards Tighten feedback loops
4 Managed Data-driven & proactive Optimize cost & performance SLIs
5 Optimizing Resilience engineering Predictive automation

Monthly drift scan → Quarterly deep review → Annual strategic recalibration.

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Scenario-Based Trade-Off Discussions

Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Scenario 1: Healthcare PHI

Context Drivers Constraints
New patient records platform handling PHI Compliance, confidentiality, clinician availability Must satisfy regulatory & audit controls early

Question: Best first-year pillar priority?

Opt Ordering Rationale (1-line)
A Cost → Performance → Security → Reliability Security debt & compliance risk early
B Security → Reliability → Performance → Cost Protect data & uptime; optimize later
C Performance → Reliability → Security → Cost Perf before protection = exposure window
D Reliability → Cost → Performance → Security Security controls arrive too late
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Scenario 2: Retail 10x Peak (Black Friday)

Context Drivers Constraints
E-commerce rebuild expecting 10x traffic surge Scale readiness, low latency, checkout continuity Limited rehearsal windows pre-event

Question: Which architecture approach best balances readiness & cost risk?

Option Approach Assessment
A Single region + basic monitoring High outage blast radius; no failover
B Active-passive + autoscale Balanced resilience + cost; warm standby
C Active-active + predictive scale Highest cost / complexity; may be overkill initially
D Pure serverless minimal planning Cold start & latency variability under sustained load
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Scenario 3: Legacy Batch Modernization

Context Drivers Constraints
Nightly monolithic batch system Need faster cycles, partial near-real-time flows Limited refactor budget this quarter

Question: Which modernization path optimizes learning velocity without over-investing early?

Option Path Assessment
A Lift-and-shift VMs Preserves toil; no structural gains
B Full microservices + events Premature fragmentation risk
C Replatform to managed services Gains ops + scalability; incremental evolution
D Full rebuild w/ AI/ML High risk + delayed value
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Scenario 4: Early-Stage Social App

Context Drivers Constraints
Seed-stage app seeking product-market fit Speed of iteration, cost discipline Uncertain growth trajectory

Question: Which approach best balances runway conservation with adaptability?

Option Strategy Assessment
A Heavy upfront security/compliance Slows learning; misaligned with current risk profile
B MVP + incremental hardening Fast feedback, layered maturity
C Immediate multi-region deployment Cost burn + operational overhead
D Heavy early ops automation Automates unknowns; wasted effort
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Well-Architected Framework Service Guides

A Decision-Making Tool

  • Assist in selecting Azure components for your workload
  • Highlight core features and capabilities essential for excellence
  • Not exhaustive configuration guides; emphasize what aligns with Well-Architected pillars
  • Enable informed decisions that support a state of operational excellence
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Well-Architected Workloads

  • Align workloads with business outcomes using the Azure Well-Architected Framework
  • Balancing functional requirements and nonfunctional trade-offs
  • Integrate design fundamentals, trade-offs, and operational best practices
  • Maintain a living workload dossier: scope (services, data, AI models), personas (human + agentic), dependencies, technical debt register, budget envelope, KPIs & maturity scores
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

Well-Architected Workloads Examples

  • AI
  • Azure Virtual Desktop
  • Azure VMware Solution
  • Mission-critical applications
  • Oracle
  • SaaS Solutions
  • SAP
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
fill
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft

### 🎯 **Collaboration Artifacts** - Architecture review boards - Design thinking workshops - Failure scenario planning - Cost optimization sessions -

Removed missing image: img/roi-chart.png (not found). Consider adding a local chart image or keep text KPIs only.

Risks: L1 False recoverability; L2 Late backup corruption detection; L3 Hidden SPOF; L4 Design vs reality drift; L5 Slow novel failure detection.

Outcome: lower dwell time & blast radius with reduced analyst toil. Risks if Ignored (by Level): 1: Credential stuffing / leaked keys 2: Flat trust zones expand blast radius 3: Slow breach containment 4: Analyst fatigue / alert backlog 5: Control regressions undetected

Treat cost like a performance metric: observable, owned, iterated Cost Risks if Ignored (by Level): 1: Unattributed spend growth 2: Surprise overruns / reactive cuts 3: Persistent waste in idle flows 4: Scaling costs outpace revenue 5: Overpaying for unused resilience Aim for unit economics clarity before advanced forecasting automation.

Operational Excellence Risks if Ignored (by Level): 1: Tribal ops knowledge silos 2: Inconsistent release quality 3: Alert noise & unclear severity 4: Repeating incidents / slow MTTR gains 5: Innovation slowdown / shadow ops Reliability & velocity converge when feedback loops are automated and trusted.

Outcome: Sustained latency control & scalable performance via automated, hypothesis-driven tuning loops. Performance Efficiency Risks if Ignored (by Level): 1: Over/under provision early tiers 2: Blind to regressions / tail spikes 3: Chasing symptoms not causes 4: Latency creep enters production 5: Plateau after easy wins

Previous bullet list version retained for reference: Global edge + health routing; Strong identity + least privilege; Observability spine (logs, metrics, traces); Autoscale + lightweight architecture; Policy & automation as guardrails. Guiding Principle: One design decision, multi-pillar benefit.

Original trade-offs block preserved for rollback: # Trade-Offs (empty slide) # Key Well-Architected Framework Trade-Offs (two-column layout: Performance vs Security, Reliability vs Cost) -- End original block

Answer: B. Notes: Establish identity hardening, encryption, audit logging before tuning performance / cost. Original verbose table preserved in VCS history.

> Aim for right-sized resilience with rehearsal capability (Answer: B; C may be evolution path if sustained global demand proves out).

Facilitator Notes: Highlight rehearsal (chaos / load) and autoscale thresholds; discuss progression B → C if error budgets stress.

> Prioritize platform leverage + incremental decomposition (Answer: C).

Facilitator Notes: Map quick wins: managed DB, queue, scheduler; carve out hotspots post replatform KPI baseline.

> Optimize for validated learning; mature controls as risk & scale increase (Answer: B).

Facilitator Notes: Introduce maturity runway: baseline hygiene → observability → scaling → advanced security & multi-region.

Needed for mermaid