Previous slide Next slide Toggle fullscreen Open presenter view
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
The Well-Architected Architect
Modernizing Cloud Excellence
Chris Ayers
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Agenda
Solution Architecture Fundamentals
Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework
Framework Overview & Assessment Cadence
Pillar Deep Dive
Trade-Offs
WAF Service Guides & Impact
Well-Architected Workloads
Q&A
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Solution Architecture Fundamentals
7 Principles for Cloud Excellence
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Architecture Fundamentals - Core Role Focus
Architecture = Intentional decision system.
You Own:
Map requirements → patterns & platform
Bake in ops (observability, support, DR) early
Surface & record trade-offs fast
Keep design iterative & reversible first
Superpower: Multi-perspective experience (build → run → secure → recover).
Ongoing decisions, not a static diagram.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Architecture Fundamentals - Decision Framework
5 Steps (loop): Identify → Analyze → Decide → Implement → Learn.
Keys
Track decisions in backlog early
Classify reversible vs one-way doors
Capture rationale & alternatives (ADR)
Link ADR → work items
Update after incidents / KPIs
Bias to reversible choices under uncertainty.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Architecture Fundamentals - Pattern & Forward Thinking
Patterns
Use proven patterns (circuit breaker, cache-aside, bulkhead, valet key)
Prefer simplicity over bespoke cleverness
Forward Scan
Scale & data growth thresholds
Compliance / residency horizon
Deprecations & preview risk
Evolution seams pre-planned
Instrument to see approaching cliffs early.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Architecture Fundamentals - Supportability & Collaboration
Supportability
Standard telemetry schema
Golden signals + synthetics
Correlation IDs & clear errors
Collaboration
Cross-discipline reviews
External architecture consults
Pattern & ADR library upkeep
Growth Loop : Learn → apply → codify.
If not operable, it’s not done.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Architecture Fundamentals - Method & Improvement
Checklists & maturity baseline
ADR catalog + pattern library
Fitness reports (drift & KPI deltas)
Loop
Assess → Prioritize → Implement → Validate → Instrument → Reassess
Outcome: Intentional, current architecture.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
1. Decision-Making Framework
Architecture Decision Records
# ADR-001: Multi-Region Strategy
Status: Accepted
Date: 2025-01-15
## Context
Need 99.99% availability for
critical healthcare platform
## Decision
Implement active-active across
3 Azure regions
## Consequences
- 3x infrastructure cost
- Complex data sync
Key Elements
Early Identification
Document decisions before they're made
Risk Assessment
One-way doors vs. two-way doors
Clear Rationale
Why this choice over alternatives
Learning Loop
Post-implementation reviews
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
3. Forward-Thinking Design
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
4. Design for Supportability
Observable by Default
Every service includes
Structured logging
Distributed tracing
Custom metrics
Health endpoints
SLI/SLO dashboards
Support-Friendly
Self-healing mechanisms
Graceful degradation
Clear error messages
Runbook automation
ChatOps integration
Success Metric: Time to resolve incidents ↓ 75% with proper observability
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
5. Continuous Skill Enhancement
Learning Paths
Certifications: AZ-305, AI-102
Specializations: FinOps, MLOps
Emerging: Quantum, Edge AI
Hands-On Practice
Weekly architecture katas
Open source contributions
Hackathon participation
AI-Augmented Skills
Copilot for architecture
AI-assisted code reviews
Automated documentation
Pattern recognition tools
Local meetups
Architecture forums
Conference speaking
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
6. Collaboration Excellence
Key Partnerships
Internal Teams
Product owners
Security champions
Site reliability engineers
Data scientists
External Experts
Cloud solution architects
Partner technical specialists
Community MVPs
Industry consultants
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
7. Methodical Design Approach
Structure Brings Success
Design: Visio, Draw.io, Lucidchart, C4 Model
Documentation: ADRs, Wiki, Backstage
Assessment: WAF Review, Azure Advisor
Validation: Chaos Engineering, Load Testing
"A good architecture is not accidental-it's methodical"
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework Goals
The Azure Well-Architected Framework drives real world business outcomes by guiding organizations to:
Enhance Resilience: Higher availability and faster recovery
Improve Security: Proactive protection of critical data
Optimize Costs: Streamlined resource usage
Accelerate Innovation: Faster feature deployment
Boost Operational Excellence: Robust monitoring and automation
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Business Impact: Real Numbers
Proven ROI & Outcomes
304% ROI within 3 years (Forrester Study)
40% reduction in downtime (Global Retailer)
25% cost savings (Financial Services)
75% faster server updates (Manufacturing)
93/100 security score (Profisee)
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Framework Benefits
Resilient, available, and recoverable workloads
Strong security and risk management
Optimized costs with high ROI
Support for agile development and operations
Consistent performance and scalability
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Azure Well-Architected Framework Overview
Pillar
Core Goal
Reliability
Stay available & recover fast
Security
Protect identities, data & workloads
Cost Optimization
Maximize business value per dollar
Operational Excellence
Efficient operations & rapid improvement
Performance Efficiency
Right-size & scale on demand
Treat the framework as an ongoing fitness regimen-not a one-time audit.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Reliability Pillar
"Will it stay up & recover?"
Focus on sustained availability, graceful degradation, and validated recovery.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Reliability - Principles
Reliability = keep user promise under failure.
Explicit SLI/RTO/RPO & UX expectations
Design for graceful degradation (resilience)
Fast detect + recover (observability + runbooks)
Minimize complexity in critical paths
Maxim: Resilience is engineered, not discovered after the fact.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Reliability - Practices
Multi-region for Tier 0 + health probes
Quarterly chaos experiments
Synthetic user journeys + health model
Tiered backups + timed restore drills
Automated failover validation
Emerging:
Advisor Score driven next action
Shift to automated chaos
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Reliability - Key Metrics
Metric
Target
Lever
Request Success Rate
≥ 99.9% (align to SLO)
Progressive delivery + health probes + fast rollback
Error Budget Burn
< 20% cycle
SLO review + hardening
MTTR
↓ trend
Auto diagnostics + rollback
Restore Drill Success
≥ 99%
Timed restore exercises
Levers: failover tests, chaos, simplification.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Reliability - Architecture Example
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Reliability - Maturity Progression
Level
Current
Next Shift
Accelerator
1 Ad Hoc
Manual restarts; unknown backup validity
Define & test RTO/RPO
Scope + first timed restore
2 Baseline
Documented failover path
Probes + scheduled restore drills
Drill cadence
3 Structured
Runbooks + starter chaos
SLO + error budget govern releases
Chaos on critical flows
4 Proactive
Auto failover + health model
Timed restore KPIs + broaden chaos
CI failover test
5 Adaptive
Continuous resilience engineering
Predictive scale + self-heal loops
Predictive scaling + self-heal scripts
Sequence: remove unknowns → speed detection → widen safe automation.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Reliability - At a Glance
Typical Early Gap
Runbooks never fully executed end-to-end
Signals to Track
Error budget burn %
RTO / RPO adherence
Successful timed restore drills
Quick Win
Run a 30-min tabletop + one automated failover script this week.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Security Pillar
"Can it be breached or abused?"
Emphasizes least privilege, segmentation, and continuous threat detection.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Security - Principles
Threat model + shared responsibility upfront
Least privilege + segmentation + encryption
Continuous assessment & patch / vuln flow
Zero Trust verification on every request
Maxim: Security is an engineering practice, not a gate.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Security - Practices & Patterns
Enforce Zero Trust (MFA, CA, JIT)
Secrets in Key Vault only
Network segmentation + WAF
Defender for Cloud remediation SLAs
Central security logging
Emerging:
AI workload safeguards (watermarking)
Automated threat triage (Copilot)
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Security - Key Metrics
Metric
Target
Lever
Secure Score
> 80%
Prioritized remediation
MFA Coverage
100%
Conditional Access policies
Vuln MTTR
< 14 days
Patch automation
Levers: least privilege, segmentation, scanning.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Security - Architecture Example
Front Door + WAF + DDoS
App Gateway / mTLS ingress
Segmented app tier (private endpoints)
Key Vault + encrypted data stores
Central SIEM + automated triage
Blueprint Goal: Rapid containment & traceability.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Security Maturity (Progression + Accelerators)
Level
Focus (Condensed)
Key Shift
Accelerator
1 Core
Hygiene (MFA, patch, secrets)
Enforce MFA & baseline hardening
MFA + secret externalization
2 Expanded
Segmentation & posture
Secure Score backlog
Segmentation + Secure Score
3 Threat-Informed
Threat modeling + IR
Central logging & triage
Threat modeling + IR runbooks
4 Adaptive
Automated response & risk-based access
SOAR workflow automation
SOAR + risk-based policies
5 Advanced
Continuous simulation & ML detection
Zero Trust + least privilege by design
Continuous simulation (red/purple)
Trajectory: static controls → signal-driven prevention & rapid containment.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Security - At a Glance
Core Azure Focus
Strong identity (MFA / PIM)
Secrets in Key Vault only
Segmentation + threat detection (Defender / Sentinel)
Fast Diagnostic
Secure Score trend + count of open critical vulns
Treat identity as the primary security boundary; reduce standing privilege relentlessly.
Typical Early Gap
Privileged identity hygiene (stale Global Admins)
Signals to Track
MFA coverage %
Key Vault secret rot cadence
Vulnerability MTTR
Quick Win
Expire unused privileged roles & enable PIM + just-in-time elevation.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cost Optimization Pillar
"Are we creating value per dollar?"
Drives financial accountability, efficiency, and spend-to-value alignment.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cost Optimization - Principles
Budget guardrails + ownership tagging
Engineer elasticity & eliminate waste
Tie spend to business KPIs & unit cost
Document cost vs reliability/perf trade-offs
Maxim: Unmeasured cost is uncontrolled cost.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cost Optimization - Practices & Governance
Enforced tagging & budgets
Autoscale + off-hour shutdown
Rightsize & commitment coverage
Spot / tiered storage
Anomaly detection & review
Emerging:
Sustainability KPIs (energy proxy)
Caching to reduce expensive ops
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cost Optimization - Key Metrics
Metric
Target
Lever
Idle Spend
< 5%
Decommission & schedules
Commitment Coverage
> 70%
Rightsize + purchase planning
Unit Cost
↓ QoQ
Performance + elasticity
Levers: tagging, scaling, lifecycle policies.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cost Optimization - Architecture Example
Enforced tagging & budgets
Autoscale + spot for batch
Storage tiering lifecycle
Cache hot read reduction
Cost dashboard & anomaly alerts
Blueprint Goal: Predictable unit economics.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cost Optimization Maturity Progression
Level
Focus (Condensed)
Key Shift
Accelerator
1 Ownership
Tags + visibility
Assign DRI & shared transparency
Tag policy + cost DRI
2 Visibility
Cost model + alerts
Formalize reports & baseline drivers
Cost model + budget alerts
3 Signals
Usage & flow analysis
Guardrails + anomaly triage cadence
Anomaly triage cadence
4 Prod Insights
Rightsizing & demand shaping
Autoscale tuning + lifecycle policies
Demand shaping + rightsizing loops
5 Optimize @ Scale
Predictive + unit economics
Forecast accuracy + DR cost optimization
Forecast accuracy + DR cost review
Trajectory: visibility → signals → automation at scale. .
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cost Optimization - At a Glance
Core Azure Focus
Enforced tagging & ownership
Elasticity & rightsizing loops
Storage lifecycle + commitment mgmt
Fast Diagnostic
Idle spend % + tag coverage heatmap
Cost fitness = visibility → accountability → automation. Optimize after measuring.
Typical Early Gap
No policy-backed tagging = opaque spend
Signals to Track
Idle / unattached resources
Savings Plan / RI coverage %
Unit cost (e.g., $ / txn) trend
Quick Win
Implement a tag policy (env, owner, costCenter) + weekly idle resource report.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Operational Excellence Pillar
"Can we change & learn fast?"
Centers on disciplined delivery, observability, and continual improvement.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Operational Excellence - Principles
Shared ownership (build → run)
Instrument first; scale second
Progressive, reversible deploys
Automate high-frequency toil
Maxim: Operate to learn; learn to operate better.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Operational Excellence - Practices & Automation
Gated CI/CD + policy
Progressive delivery rings
Standard SLO dashboards
Automate frequent runbooks
Blameless retros → ADR updates
Emerging:
Maturity scoring focus
AI-assisted event reduction
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Operational Excellence - Key Metrics
Metric
Target
Lever
Deploy Frequency
Daily+
Small batches + automation
Change Failure Rate
< 15%
Progressive rollout + tests
MTTR
< 1h Sev2
Runbooks + observability
Levers: telemetry unification, rollback automation.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Operational Excellence - Architecture Example
Gated PR → secure build
Canary + progressive rings
Unified telemetry spine
Automated remediation rules
Post-incident ADR updates
Blueprint Goal: High velocity, low MTTR.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Operational Excellence - Maturity Progression
Level
Focus (Condensed)
Key Shift
Accelerator
1 Foundation
DevOps culture + basic CI
Shared vocab & source control norms
Shared on-call + IaC adoption
2 Standardize
Roles, IaC, core processes
Off-the-shelf tooling & baseline automation
Standardized pipelines + roles
3 Release Ready
Env + gated pipelines
Health model + incident workflow
Health model + incident taxonomy
4 Production Ops
SLO dashboards + progressive delivery
Runbook automation & retros to ADRs
Auto-remediation + retro loop
5 Adaptable
Continuous modernization
Self-service envs & pervasive automation
Self-service env + friction audits
Trajectory: culture → standardization → automation → modernization.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Operational Excellence - At a Glance
Core Azure Focus
Gated CI/CD + progressive delivery
Unified observability spine
Automated runbooks & incident workflow
Fast Diagnostic
DORA metrics snapshot (Deploy Freq, Lead Time, CFR, MTTR)
Velocity safely increases when feedback loops are fast, visible, and trusted.
Typical Early Gap
Telemetry exists but no actionable SLO dashboards
Signals to Track
Change failure rate (%)
MTTR trend
Auto-remediation success count
Quick Win
Define one SLO + error budget and wire alert to a Slack/Teams channel.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
"Will it meet SLOs under scale?"
Ensures responsive scaling, optimized hot paths, and sustained tail latency control.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Business SLOs (latency / throughput)
Just-in-time elastic scaling
Partition & cache for hot paths
Measure & tune based on profiling
Maxim: Performance is a promise you must continuously verify.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Load + capacity tests pre-peak
Autoscale on meaningful metrics
CDN + Redis hot path caching
Partition / shard early
Profile tail latency (P95/P99)
Emerging:
Adaptive concurrency controls
Predictive autoscale policies
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Metric
Target
Lever
P95 Latency
SLO met
Caching + profiling
Cache Hit Ratio
> 85%
Key design + eviction
Autoscale Reaction
< 5 min
Threshold tuning
Levers: async patterns, caching, partitioning.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
CDN + Front Door cache
Stateless autoscaling API
Async queue offload
Redis + partitioned data
Predictive scale rules
Blueprint Goal: Linear scale within latency SLO.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Level
Focus (Condensed)
Key Shift
Accelerator
1 Targets
Initial SLOs & component fit
Capture perf expectations early
SLO draft + rough capacity estimate
2 Baseline Metrics
Instrument & capacity plan
Critical flow metrics & baselines
Perf baselines + hot path mapping
3 Signal Driven
Real user + synthetic insights
Hot path tuning + data-driven refactors
Profiling + targeted caching/sharding
4 Prod Optimization
Isolation & advanced data mgmt
Perf gates in delivery pipeline
Perf gates in CI/CD + isolation
5 Continuous Tuning
Experimentation & automation
Hypothesis-driven improvements
Hypothesis experiments + predictive scale
Trajectory: establish targets → measure → signal-driven → gated optimization.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Core Azure Focus
Autoscale on meaningful metrics
Hot path caching & partitioning
Profiling + tail latency management
Fast Diagnostic
P95 latency vs SLO delta (gap & trend)
Performance improvements start with a repeatable baseline—instrument before tuning.
Typical Early Gap
No sustained load / capacity test baseline
Signals to Track
P95 / P99 latency trend
Cache hit ratio (%)
Autoscale reaction time
Quick Win
Run a 1-hour load test; record baseline P95 + identify top 1 slow span.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Trade-Offs
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Cross-Pillar Shared Levers
Lever
Primary Pillars Impacted
Core Benefit
Global edge + health routing
Reliability, Performance
Faster failover & lower latency at scale
Strong identity + least privilege
Security, Operational Excellence
Reduced blast radius & clearer access governance
Observability spine (logs, metrics, traces)
All Pillars
Unified signals accelerate detection, tuning, and learning
Autoscale + lightweight architecture
Performance, Cost, Reliability
Elastic capacity without chronic overprovisioning
Policy & automation guardrails
Security, Cost, Operational Excellence
Consistent compliance & reduced manual toil
One leveraged investment should advance at least two pillars—use this list to frame improvement proposals.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Trade-Offs Overview
Tension Pair
Competing Forces
Friction Signal
Primary Mitigation Lens
Performance vs Security
Latency vs inspection depth
Rising auth / inspection latency
Edge offload + scoped deep inspection
Reliability vs Cost
Redundancy vs spend efficiency
Escalating standby cost
Tiered criticality + right-sized DR
Velocity vs Stability
Change frequency vs failure risk
Spike in change failure rate
Progressive delivery + automated rollback
Cost vs Performance
Budget guardrails vs headroom
Reactive scaling / throttling
Autoscale + load test baselines
Security vs Operability
Tight control vs engineer throughput
Privilege escalation toil
JIT least privilege + workflow automation
Guiding Principle: Surface → Document → Measure → Recalibrate.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Unstated trade-offs become accidental architecture
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Trade-Off Matrix
Optimize For
Potential Impact On
Example Tension
Mitigation Strategy
Extreme Reliability
Cost Optimization
Active-active multi-region cost ↑
Tiered criticality; pilot light for non-critical
Strict Security Controls
Performance Efficiency
Added latency from deep inspection
Offload with Azure Front Door WAF / caching
Lowest Possible Cost
Reliability / Performance
Under-provisioned resources
Autoscale + performance SLO guardrails
Max Performance
Cost Optimization
Over-provisioning high SKU
Right-size via load test baselines + scheduled reviews
Rapid Deployment Velocity
Security / Stability
Increased change failure risk
Shift-left scans + progressive delivery
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Pillar Interactions & Decision Anchors
Operational Excellence Enables All
Enables secure deployments
Improves reliability through consistency
Provides insights for cost optimization
Supports performance monitoring
Decision Anchors
Start with explicit business outcomes & candidate SLOs
Declare non-negotiable (guardrail) pillars per workload tier
Make trade-offs transparent & time-box re-evaluation
Record decisions + linked metrics in ADRs
Momentum Pattern: Clear anchors + observable metrics turn pillar tension into a continuous improvement loop.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Continuous Improvement & Pillar Maturity
Level
Trait
Focus
1 Ad Hoc
Reactive, inconsistent
Baseline inventory & metrics
2 Emerging
Initial standards appear
Define SLOs & security baselines
3 Defined
Repeatable + dashboards
Tighten feedback loops
4 Managed
Data-driven & proactive
Optimize cost & performance SLIs
5 Optimizing
Resilience engineering
Predictive automation
Monthly drift scan → Quarterly deep review → Annual strategic recalibration.
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Scenario-Based Trade-Off Discussions
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Scenario 1: Healthcare PHI
Context
Drivers
Constraints
New patient records platform handling PHI
Compliance, confidentiality, clinician availability
Must satisfy regulatory & audit controls early
Question: Best first-year pillar priority?
Opt
Ordering
Rationale (1-line)
A
Cost → Performance → Security → Reliability
Security debt & compliance risk early
B
Security → Reliability → Performance → Cost
Protect data & uptime; optimize later
C
Performance → Reliability → Security → Cost
Perf before protection = exposure window
D
Reliability → Cost → Performance → Security
Security controls arrive too late
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Scenario 2: Retail 10x Peak (Black Friday)
Context
Drivers
Constraints
E-commerce rebuild expecting 10x traffic surge
Scale readiness, low latency, checkout continuity
Limited rehearsal windows pre-event
Question: Which architecture approach best balances readiness & cost risk?
Option
Approach
Assessment
A
Single region + basic monitoring
High outage blast radius; no failover
B
Active-passive + autoscale
Balanced resilience + cost; warm standby
C
Active-active + predictive scale
Highest cost / complexity; may be overkill initially
D
Pure serverless minimal planning
Cold start & latency variability under sustained load
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Scenario 3: Legacy Batch Modernization
Context
Drivers
Constraints
Nightly monolithic batch system
Need faster cycles, partial near-real-time flows
Limited refactor budget this quarter
Question: Which modernization path optimizes learning velocity without over-investing early?
Option
Path
Assessment
A
Lift-and-shift VMs
Preserves toil; no structural gains
B
Full microservices + events
Premature fragmentation risk
C
Replatform to managed services
Gains ops + scalability; incremental evolution
D
Full rebuild w/ AI/ML
High risk + delayed value
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Scenario 4: Early-Stage Social App
Context
Drivers
Constraints
Seed-stage app seeking product-market fit
Speed of iteration, cost discipline
Uncertain growth trajectory
Question: Which approach best balances runway conservation with adaptability?
Option
Strategy
Assessment
A
Heavy upfront security/compliance
Slows learning; misaligned with current risk profile
B
MVP + incremental hardening
Fast feedback, layered maturity
C
Immediate multi-region deployment
Cost burn + operational overhead
D
Heavy early ops automation
Automates unknowns; wasted effort
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Well-Architected Framework Service Guides
A Decision-Making Tool
Assist in selecting Azure components for your workload
Highlight core features and capabilities essential for excellence
Not exhaustive configuration guides; emphasize what aligns with Well-Architected pillars
Enable informed decisions that support a state of operational excellence
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Well-Architected Workloads
Align workloads with business outcomes using the Azure Well-Architected Framework
Balancing functional requirements and nonfunctional trade-offs
Integrate design fundamentals, trade-offs, and operational best practices
Maintain a living workload dossier: scope (services, data, AI models), personas (human + agentic), dependencies, technical debt register, budget envelope, KPIs & maturity scores
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Well-Architected Workloads Examples
AI
Azure Virtual Desktop
Azure VMware Solution
Mission-critical applications
Oracle
SaaS Solutions
SAP
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
Chris Ayers | chris-ayers.com | Senior SWE, Microsoft
### 🎯 **Collaboration Artifacts**
- Architecture review boards
- Design thinking workshops
- Failure scenario planning
- Cost optimization sessions
-
Removed missing image: img/roi-chart.png (not found). Consider adding a local chart image or keep text KPIs only.
Risks: L1 False recoverability; L2 Late backup corruption detection; L3 Hidden SPOF; L4 Design vs reality drift; L5 Slow novel failure detection.
Outcome: lower dwell time & blast radius with reduced analyst toil.
Risks if Ignored (by Level):
1: Credential stuffing / leaked keys
2: Flat trust zones expand blast radius
3: Slow breach containment
4: Analyst fatigue / alert backlog
5: Control regressions undetected
Treat cost like a performance metric: observable, owned, iterated
Cost Risks if Ignored (by Level):
1: Unattributed spend growth
2: Surprise overruns / reactive cuts
3: Persistent waste in idle flows
4: Scaling costs outpace revenue
5: Overpaying for unused resilience
Aim for unit economics clarity before advanced forecasting automation.
Operational Excellence Risks if Ignored (by Level):
1: Tribal ops knowledge silos
2: Inconsistent release quality
3: Alert noise & unclear severity
4: Repeating incidents / slow MTTR gains
5: Innovation slowdown / shadow ops
Reliability & velocity converge when feedback loops are automated and trusted.
Outcome: Sustained latency control & scalable performance via automated, hypothesis-driven tuning loops.
Performance Efficiency Risks if Ignored (by Level):
1: Over/under provision early tiers
2: Blind to regressions / tail spikes
3: Chasing symptoms not causes
4: Latency creep enters production
5: Plateau after easy wins
Previous bullet list version retained for reference:
Global edge + health routing; Strong identity + least privilege; Observability spine (logs, metrics, traces); Autoscale + lightweight architecture; Policy & automation as guardrails. Guiding Principle: One design decision, multi-pillar benefit.
Original trade-offs block preserved for rollback:
# Trade-Offs (empty slide)
# Key Well-Architected Framework Trade-Offs (two-column layout: Performance vs Security, Reliability vs Cost)
-- End original block
Answer: B. Notes: Establish identity hardening, encryption, audit logging before tuning performance / cost. Original verbose table preserved in VCS history.
> Aim for right-sized resilience with rehearsal capability (Answer: B; C may be evolution path if sustained global demand proves out).
Facilitator Notes: Highlight rehearsal (chaos / load) and autoscale thresholds; discuss progression B → C if error budgets stress.
> Prioritize platform leverage + incremental decomposition (Answer: C).
Facilitator Notes: Map quick wins: managed DB, queue, scheduler; carve out hotspots post replatform KPI baseline.
> Optimize for validated learning; mature controls as risk & scale increase (Answer: B).
Facilitator Notes: Introduce maturity runway: baseline hygiene → observability → scaling → advanced security & multi-region.